Claude Optimization · documentation-grade sources

Claude rewards precision. Give it something exact.

Claude is the surface where careless copy is punished hardest and good documentation pays off most. Optimising for it is mostly about publishing precise, verifiable technical facts — and letting ClaudeBot read them.

How Claude picks sources

Four preferences worth designing for.

Consistent across our stored answers.

01
Public documentation
Claude leans on docs more than marketing pages. If yours are gated, you are largely invisible here.
02
Explicit limits and caveats
It prefers sources that state boundaries plainly — rate limits, unsupported cases, known trade-offs.
03
Versioned facts
Dates and version numbers raise confidence and reduce hedging in the answer.
04
Careful phrasing
Overclaiming gets hedged or dropped. Precise, modest statements survive.
What we fix

Six levers for Claude.

Almost all of them are editorial precision, not volume.

ClaudeBot access

robots.txt, CDN and WAF rules audited for ClaudeBot, Claude-User and Claude-SearchBot.

Public docs subset

Limits, integrations and setup steps opened up without exposing anything sensitive.

Explicit boundaries

What your product does not do, stated plainly — a strong trust signal in technical answers.

Versioning and dates

Documentation given versions and last-updated dates so facts can be trusted and attributed.

Precision editing

Marketing superlatives replaced with verifiable statements that survive summarisation.

Answer monitoring

Weekly runs on technical prompts, with hedged or inaccurate descriptions flagged.

Before / after

What precision looks like.

Same facts, different survivability.

Overclaimed
Our platform scales infinitely and
integrates with everything you use.
Enterprise-grade security included.

// nothing verifiable
// nothing quotable
Precise
Weekly re-checks across ChatGPT, Gemini,
Claude and Perplexity.
Mention share and citations tracked
per prompt. Monthly reports as PDF and CSV.
Hosted in the EU.
Questions

About Claude.

It retrieves when the question needs current information, and cites what it finds. Static training knowledge covers the rest, which is why entity consistency matters too.

Documentation is the highest-confidence source type for technical questions. Gated docs remove you from exactly the answers your buyers ask.

To be retrievable from your own pages, yes. You can still block specific paths.

Usually inconsistent or unverifiable claims. Precise, dated, bounded statements reduce hedging noticeably.

Presence, position and framing on your tracked technical prompts, from stored answers.

See how Claude describes you.

Free, and it flags every place the description is hedged or wrong.

Run the free check